Created by: magaliruffier
Requirements
- Filling out the template is required. Any pull request that does not include enough information to be reviewed in a timely manner may be closed at the maintainers' discretion;
- Review the contributing guidelines for this repository; remember in particular:
- do not modify code without testing for regression
- provide simple unit tests to test the changes
- if you change the schema you must patch the test databases as well, see Updating the schema
- the PR must not fail unit testing
Description
The list of sources used for gene naming and gene description has been consolidated in a single place and used for most vertebrate species. This removes the need to maintain multiple lists for different species with the risk of them being out of sync. Additionally, when multiple choices are available, a re-ordering has been applied to increase the chances of making the same choice when the pipeline is re-run
Use case
Describe the problem. Please provide an example representing the motivation behind the need for having these changes in place. We have genes where the name and the description are different, because different sources were used for each. This is confusing users. We also have cases where the same gene has a different name from one release to another, because there are two choices and one is arbitrarily chosen each time
Benefits
If applicable, describe the advantages the changes will have. More consistency in the xref assignment, less queries from users, easier explanation of the name assignment strategy
Possible Drawbacks
If applicable, describe any possible undesirable consequence of the changes. None that I can see
Testing
Have you added/modified unit tests to test the changes? no test cases, but the xref pipeline has been run on a large number of species to check the results
If so, do the tests pass/fail? the pipeline runs fine and produces consistent results on the species it was tested on
Have you run the entire test suite and no regression was detected? NA