ENSCORESW-3526 changed provider.* metakey to assembly.provider_*

Created by: ameya1981

Requirements

• Filling out the template is required. Any pull request that does not include enough information to be reviewed in a timely manner may be closed at the maintainers' discretion;
• Review the contributing guidelines for this repository; remember in particular:
  • do not modify code without testing for regression
  • provide simple unit tests to test the changes
  • if you change the schema you must patch the test databases as well, see Updating the schema
  • the PR must not fail unit testing

Description

Change in meta-key provider.name to assembly.provider_name

Use case

As per https://www.ebi.ac.uk/panda/jira/browse/ENSINT-361

Benefits

Generic meta-keys

Possible Drawbacks

NA

Testing

No changes to test-cases. Only test db updated.

If so, do the tests pass/fail?

NA

modules/Bio/EnsEMBL/Utils/SeqDumper.pm

@@ -477,8 +477,8 @@ sub dump_embl {
   #Database References (we are not dumping these)
 
   #Get annotation source 
-  my ($provider_name)   = @{$meta_container->list_value_by_key('provider.name')};
-  my ($provider_url)    = @{$meta_container->list_value_by_key('provider.url')};
+  my ($provider_name)   = @{$meta_container->list_value_by_key('assembly.provider_name')};
+  my ($provider_url)    = @{$meta_container->list_value_by_key('assembly.provider_url')};
   my $annotation_source = q{};
    
   if($provider_name) {
@@ -669,8 +669,8 @@ sub dump_genbank {
   #refereneces
 
   #Get annotation source 
-  my ($provider_name)   = @{$meta_container->list_value_by_key('provider.name')};
-  my ($provider_url)    = @{$meta_container->list_value_by_key('provider.url')};
+  my ($provider_name)   = @{$meta_container->list_value_by_key('assembly.provider_name')};
+  my ($provider_url)    = @{$meta_container->list_value_by_key('assembly.provider_url')};
   my $annotation_source = q{};
   
   if($provider_name) {